As global tensions rise and the US shifts in its NATO commitments, the UK faces a critical decision on defence spending. With the war in Ukraine ongoing and Russian aggression threatening European stability, Britain must determine how to balance national security with economic realities.
A Need To React?
Three years on from the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the debate over whether the UK needs to increase its defence spending has never been greater. NATO’s Secretary General, Mark Rutte, has stated that members of the bloc will need to spend “considerably more than 3%” of their GDP on defence- the UK currently spends an estimated 2.33% of GDP on defence as per 2024.
In addition to this, US President Trump has stated that NATO countries within Europe should spend 5% of GDP on defence- a stark statement from the supposed ‘leader of the free world’ and a man who is visibly drawing closer ties to Russia in a juxtaposing manner to Biden’s foreign policy.
This begs the question on how the new Labour government carries out foreign policy and defence spending in a new era with Europe no longer being able to rely on the US for assistance. Whilst the ‘special relationship’ with the US will likely endure, Britain will most likely not be a viable pathway to link the US and Europe together. Britain will need to take a lead in defence to help protect Ukraine from the detrimental impacts of Russia and the invasion which, in turn, helps protect Britain and British interests.
Economic Consequences
Whilst spending 5% of GDP on defence currently seems like a relatively unrealistic idea, the more attainable 2.5% has been set as a goal by the Government. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has claimed “that’s the reality” when referencing an increase in defence spending – suggesting it is a key government policy.
The real question is how will this integral boost in defence spending be paid for? Before the 2024 General Election, Chancellor Rachel Reeves promised that Labour would not raise income tax, VAT or employees National Insurance which essentially leaves the government boxed in.
Bloomberg has reported that ‘unprotected departments’ (departments outside of health, education and defence) may have to find budget cuts of up to 11%. This provides a multitude of difficulties which could lead to cuts in key areas such as justice and local government which are already struggling with tight budgets. Many of the areas likely to be affected were already hit hard by austerity measures in 2010 and such further cuts would not be appreciated by the various Secretaries of State who would likely see this as a betrayal of core Labour values which they were elected upon.
Necessary Spending
The ongoing war in Ukraine and the subsequent rise in tensions with Russia have emphasised the importance of military readiness, making increased UK defence spending more beneficial than ever.
With the threat of Russian aggression destabilising Europe, a stronger UK military would ensure that the country could protect its interests as well as those of NATO allies and Ukraine. Greater investment in defence would not only enhance national security but also reinforce its commitment to global stability. Furthermore, expanding the defence budget would also aid industries, creating jobs in manufacturing and technology while ensuring the armed forces remain well-equipped to counter the many threats that the modern-day world faces – particularly those from Russia and its allies.
Final Thought
An increase in defence spending is a necessity in today’s uncertain and unpredictable global world and will define how the West takes a position against Russia and its allies with less aid from America. The financial implications of such an increase in spending will have to be managed carefully in order to maintain Reeves’ fiscal rules and help create a more stable and secure United Kingdom.
For more of Curia’s articles on UK defence spending, please click here.
