In a bold move, Chancellor Rachel Reeves presented a Labour budget that leaned heavily leftward, surprising some whilst upholding Labour’s promises for others. By increasing taxes and borrowing, while committing to substantial investment in education, healthcare, and social infrastructure, Labour hopes to reshape the UK’s economic landscape.
However, with economic growth projections downgraded and inflation concerns rising, many question whether these measures will bolster or burden Britain’s economy.
What Do These Changes Mean for You or Your Business?
Employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs): Burdening Businesses?
One of the budget’s central tax increases is the significant hike in employer National Insurance Contributions (NICs), anticipated to generate £25.7 billion by 2029-30. The employer NIC rate will rise from 13.8% to 15%, with the threshold at which employers start paying NICs lowered from £9,100 to £5,000.
These changes mean that employers, particularly small businesses, face higher costs to retain staff and hire new employees. Labour argues that this increase is necessary to fund essential services like the NHS and public schools, but businesses have expressed their concerns. Some industry representatives warn that smaller firms may face challenges absorbing these additional costs, potentially leading to fewer job openings and suppressed wage growth.
While Reeves insists these measures will help avoid a return to austerity, the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) and the Federation of Small Businesses (FSB) have raised questions about the practicality of such heavy NIC increases amidst current inflationary pressures. Some economists suggest the hike may inadvertently encourage higher consumer prices, with businesses passing on these costs to customers, risking inflationary feedback loops that could prolong economic stagnation.
Labour’s manifesto commitment to fairness in tax distribution for the “working people” is evident here, but the cost to businesses may hinder the desired economic growth. With growth projections revised downward by the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), the question is whether these changes risk curbing the very growth Labour aims to drive.
Capital Gains and Inheritance Tax: Impacts on Wealth Management
Labour’s new budget changes to capital gains and inheritance taxes aim to make wealth distribution fairer, but they could also impact personal finances for many. Capital gains tax rates are rising from 10% to 18% for basic-rate taxpayers and from 20% to 24% for higher-rate payers, which could discourage investments in property and stocks—areas where many people tend to build their wealth.
Inheritance tax adjustments include freezing the tax-free threshold at £325,000 until 2030 and taxing inherited pensions from 2027, pulling more families into the tax net. While these measures are designed to address inequality, there’s concern that they’ll put a heavier tax load on middle-income households who rely on home equity and pensions as financial safeguards for future generations. This balance between promoting equity and preserving family wealth is likely to keep the policy debate going.
VAT on Private School Fees: A Move Toward Equality or Limiting Choice?
Another high-profile change is the application of VAT to private school fees starting in 2025, expected to raise £1.7 billion by 2029-30. This policy, long championed by Labour, is designed to ‘’level the playing field’’ between public and private schools by directing funds to underfunded state schools.
However, there are concerns that this move may unintentionally limit educational choice, as private schools facing higher costs may increase fees or close, reducing options for parents. Furthermore, while this measure is intended to promote equity, some have argued it could lead to greater socio-economic divides if families who would have opted for private education find themselves unable to do so, leading to further strain on the public education system.
Electric Vehicles and Energy Profits: Mixed Signals on Environmental Policy
In an effort to promote sustainable transport, Labour’s budget is extending incentives for electric vehicles, with Company Car Tax incentives until 2028. However, this is accompanied by an increase in the energy profits levy, extended to 2029-30, which some argue sends a conflicting message on green policy. Air passenger duty on private jets will also rise by 50%, which is the equivalent of £450 per passenger.
Labour has positioned itself as a proponent of green initiatives, and incentives for EV adoption align with this stance. However, the increase in the energy profits levy, although it targets windfall gains by fossil fuel companies, may indirectly impact energy prices for consumers and raise concerns about future energy investments. Balancing environmental goals with the need for consistent energy sources will require ongoing policy recalibrations, especially as global energy markets fluctuate.
Reeves announced that the UK government will maintain the 5p per litre cut in fuel duty and freeze the rate again for another year, citing the high cost of living and economic uncertainty. This decision will prevent a planned 7p rise per litre, offering financial relief to drivers but costing the government over £3 billion. Critics argue that this continued freeze favours motorists over investing in greener transportation options.
Labour’s “Investment” in Public Services: NHS and Education
The government’s significant investment in the NHS—an increase of £22 billion next year—underscores its commitment to tackling pressing issues in healthcare, including the current backlog of nearly 8 million patients awaiting treatment. Reeves contends that this investment is crucial to reforming the NHS and reducing wait times, a top voter concern in the last election.
The additional capital investment aims to modernise the NHS infrastructure, but questions remain about whether funding alone will be enough to address deep-rooted structural issues. For example, some healthcare analysts warn that without substantive changes to management and operational efficiency, these investments may only offer short-term relief.
Similarly, the additional funding directed to public schools aligns with Labour’s broader education strategy, though its effectiveness will depend on how funds are allocated and managed. Ensuring these resources reach classrooms rather than administrative costs will be vital in achieving meaningful improvements in educational outcomes.
Going Forward: Slower Growth, Higher Borrowing Costs?
Despite Labour’s ambitious plans, the OBR predicts an economic slowdown, with lower growth expectations for the coming years. While Reeves’ budget aims to fund essential services, the OBR warns that higher taxes and borrowing could exacerbate inflation and increase bond yields. This scenario could mean higher borrowing costs for the government, potentially translating to higher mortgage rates for households.
In a high-borrowing, high-tax environment, Labour faces the challenge of maintaining investor confidence while addressing public demand for improved services. Striking this balance is essential if Reeves’ policies are to foster sustainable economic growth rather than stifle it.
Final Thoughts
Labour’s budget, though progressive, has spurred criticism from some quarters who argue that the substantial tax increases could stifle economic momentum. By focusing on revenue generation to fund ambitious social programs, Labour is prioritising redistributive policies that align with its campaign promises. However, the OBR’s revised growth forecast casts doubt on whether these measures will yield the long-term economic uplift envisioned.
The challenge for Labour lies in implementing these changes while mitigating potential downsides: increased costs for businesses, constrained job growth, and inflationary pressures. While the budget’s revenue-raising ambitions are clear, the path to achieving these goals without unintended setbacks remains uncertain. As Britain adjusts to Labour’s ambitious fiscal changes, the coming years will reveal whether this budget represents a sustainable shift toward economic stability or an overly ambitious leap that tests the resilience of the UK economy.
For more budget analysis, please click here.
