On December 8, 2024, news broke of the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria. After 24 years of brutal dictatorship and 13 years of civil war, the Assad regime was toppled by opposition forces, led by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS). While this was a moment of celebration for millions of Syrians, it marked the beginning of a complex chapter for the international community, especially the UK. This article examines the implications for Britain across diplomacy, security, and asylum policy.
The Fall of Assad: A Turning Point
The rapid collapse of the Assad regime surprised many observers. Damascus fell to rebel forces, forcing Assad to flee. This abrupt end came after years of repression and strategic alliances with Iran and Russia. The Baathist regime, which had held power since 1963, had increasingly become a launchpad for Iran’s regional ambitions and a chess piece in Russia’s geopolitical maneuvers.
Russia’s significant investment in the regime – from financial loans to military intervention – was instrumental in propping up Assad for years. Starting in 2015, Russian airstrikes played a pivotal role in securing his survival. However, the regime’s swift collapse has left Moscow and Tehran grappling with the loss of a key ally in the region. For the UK, this shifts the dynamics of Middle Eastern diplomacy and presents new challenges.
Hayat Tahrir al-Sham: A Complicated Successor
HTS, the group now in control, is officially proscribed terrorist organization by the UK, US, and EU. This designation complicates international engagement. Under UK law, promoting, supporting, or being a member of HTS is a criminal offense. Consequently, the UK cannot establish conventional diplomatic relations with the group, even though communication channels are crucial to understanding and addressing the evolving situation in Syria.
The UK government has taken a cautious approach, mirroring the stance of the United States. Foreign Secretary David Lammy stated that HTS would be judged on its actions, emphasising the importance of a pragmatic approach. HTS is currently under scrutiny due to its controversial history, marked by accusations of extremism and human rights abuses. The group’s ability to transition from militancy to effective governance remains uncertain, adding layers of complexity to how international actors, including the UK, will engage with Syria moving forward.
Implications for UK Policy
1. Asylum and Immigration
One immediate consequence of Assad’s fall is its impact on asylum applications. Syrians were the fifth-largest group of asylum seekers in the UK as of September 2024. Many applicants cited fear of the Assad regime as the primary reason for seeking refuge. With Assad gone, the UK government has paused Syrian asylum applications to reassess these claims. However, new challenges are emerging as individuals linked to the former regime now seek asylum, raising security concerns.
Balancing humanitarian obligations with national security will be a delicate task for the UK. Policymakers must consider the implications of granting or denying asylum to those associated with a toppled regime, as well as the risks posed by potential extremists fleeing Syria.
2. Sanctions on Syria
The UK’s sanctions on Syria were primarily imposed due to the Assad regime’s actions. With the regime’s fall, there is a growing debate about whether these sanctions should be lifted. However, separate sanctions related to HTS’s terrorist designation remain in place. A thorough review will be needed to navigate the fine line between fostering recovery and ensuring security.
3. Regional Stability and Counterterrorism
The UK’s strategic interests in Syria go beyond Assad’s departure. Preventing a resurgence of the Islamic State (IS) remains a priority, as does supporting Israel’s security and countering extremism. The international community, including the UK, the US, and the EU, has called for political negotiations under UN Security Council Resolution 2254, which envisions a new Syrian constitution and free elections.
HTS’s rule introduces uncertainties. This includes the extent to which it will prioritise governance over militancy and whether it can gain domestic and international legitimacy. The answers to these questions will shape Syria’s trajectory and influence UK policy in the region.
Final Thought: Opportunities and Challenges Ahead
The fall of Assad marks a potential turning point for Syria’s future. While the end of his regime offers hope for millions, it also opens the door to a range of uncertainties. The UK must navigate this new landscape carefully, balancing its security concerns with its commitments to humanitarian aid and regional stability.
Much of Syria’s future will depend on HTS’s governance and the international community’s ability to engage constructively. For the UK, this moment demands nuanced and adaptive policies to address the shifting dynamics of a post-Assad Syria.
For more of Curia’s foreign policy analysis, please click here. To find out more about joining Curia UK’s Foreign Policy and Defence Research Group, please email team@curiauk.com.
